Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - mountainblade

Pages: [1]
1
Always loved defense, wanting to test out the new rune mastery and it looks to have some good things even for a phyiscal dmg based defender. (dmg boosting lmb attack, seal of fate/aftershock, good buffs, runeword explode)
However it looks much more focused on elemental damage, and that 100% int boost from runeweapon looks very tasty indeed.

So vote early vote often, the fate of Jim Thunderham is in your hands. voting guide below

INT based build- Pros
different from other defenders
smart
maximizes rune buffs and skills
makes his own preserves in mason jars
cons-
defenses phys dmg boosts WASTED
harder to gear?

STR based build - Pros
Still gets some good buffs from rune- and takes full advantage of defense
easier to gear
Can move heavy logs easily (good if building a cabin)
cons-
doesnt maximize potential of rune weapon
may be easily conned by nefarious vendors
wont fight the week an adam sandler movie releases


2
New Members Introduction / greetings and happy holidays
« on: 24 December 2017, 17:55:48 »
I used to post on the tq forums and it is good to see some familiar faces here.
hope you all enjoy/enjoyed your xmas, kwanzaa, hanukkah, festivus, and hondadays celebrations. (if u celebrate toyotathon we cant be friends)

3
So I am used to the OLD Tq style of more phys damage = more pierce so go all strength. Should I be focusing more on dex? If I ignore blade honing is it safe to go all str? I will likely be using spear/shield to impress monsters with my style.

Please feed my hungry brainpan with your delicious, delicious knowledge. Thank you.

Pages: [1]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal