General > General Discussion

Poorly Thought Out Items

(1/8) > >>

botebote77:
(This is not a critique or resentment to the game.  Sometimes it’s good to have fun  ::)  )

Aloha!  So let’s talk about items.  I know many items are good, some are so so.  But some are just plain out weird.



What is up with that reduced int requirement for armors and weapons? Why would you need to reduce int requirement when the item itself requires high int already?  Well i know it has it’s uses but… really? -30% int requirement for a lvl 48 mage item?  The reduced int requirement for weapons is even more weird.  The only int based weapons in this game are staves.  Reduced requirements, especially as high as 30%, is usually sought out so you can keep said stat to as low as minimum.  So basically, if you want to equip a staff, you would want to keep intelligence to as low possible because why would you need int for a staff weilder right?  Eh?  Is that right?  bonkers.

Veterans know that the best use for that is if you want to twink your toon to equip lvl 48 or below staves but with higher int requirement like Caduceus and Eye of Osiris to name a few.  But veterans also know that it’s a poorly thought out design because soon you can equip it anyway without the need for -30% int requirement.  The boots will just outgrow it’s usefulness and it’s a shame because it’s part of a pretty good set.





80% Reduced Defensive Ability.  On a bow.  Really now. Well yeah it’s still useful for a petmaster and for multiplayer.  Ok ranger, because this is one of the best weapons for a ranger right?  Surely a good tactic for a ranger is equipping a bow that reduces defensive ability right?  Forget about your own damage, the important thing is your wolves deal more damage.  And multiplayer because if you want to play an archer on  a multiplayer, surely you would want to be a support.  Right?  Get a grip.


So let’s talk about Ragnarok items..

Devs:  It’s Ragnarok and part of the new content is we will be adding a new type of weapon
Us:  Ok we’ll farm for them
Devs:  Yes.  We’ll make sure you find them.  Lots and lots and lots of them
Us:  This is too much really.  We want to find other items too  :-\
Devs:  You're welcome  >:D


Devs:  You know you should really try a club for a Hunting toon
Us:  Eh? Why would we want a club when a spear or bow is the ideal weapon?
Devs:  Because we’ll make it very good for you
Us:  Ok I’ll use it for my conqueror
Devs:  No please. We’ll even add +2 to Hunting

there  ;)


Devs:  We’ve included many new items.  You should try them
Us:  Ok we’ll mix it with some of our items
Devs:  Ah no.  Those vanilla items are outdated now.  You can forget about them.  We’ll prove it to you

WNG:
Giant's Tooth.






Enough said.

Hector:
Yeah, just found that Head Hunter's Pride and I was like, what the hell??

Regarding the reduced DA on that bow... I have no idea which one is more frustrating and stupid;

This, or the veteran prefix on a bow.. still not fixed, still ignored.. when looking at changelogs on any update, all I see is "fixed the bla bla sound on satyr hero" "fixed the mesh/colour on bla bla armor"..

And comparing those two mage leggings, I guess it simply shows the amount of creativity, or should we say, laziness of these guys.. 

sauruz:

--- Quote from: Hector on 16 July 2018, 22:31:46 ---
And comparing those two mage leggings, I guess it simply shows the amount of creativity, or should we say, laziness of these guys..

--- End quote ---

if im not wrong, archmage set and adept set its from vanilla version, no ?

Hector:
Yes.. and that is the exact evidence of their laziness (Nordic).. they still haven't fixed what the original devs left unfixed.. they already have received the amount of attention they expected (maybe even more) from the gamers around the world, so they don't see a reason to further improve the game.. this is my interpretation on this matter..

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page