Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - gasconron

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9
31
@botebote77 No need to be salty that was obviously directed at me, lol. You have said your piece and we have acknowledged your point. I have said my piece, and explained that not everyone has the same universal standard in defining cheating. You're a purist gamer and I'm a min-max'er. These two types will never see eye to eye when it comes to opinion.

That's why in cases like this a consensus must be established to draw the middle ground. This is obviously a new mechanic in the game that has not been accounted for in this challenge, and it is being brought up to reach a decision. I'm in favor of abusing it and you are not. Leave it at that.


32
RE: inventory, if I am able to then sure.
RE: Soul, unfortunately, I've had no interactions with the Soul, and I'm too shy to PM. I mean if it's people like you, Stormy, Violos, irma that I interacted with in the forums in the past I would.

I wouldn't be as presumptious to just ask the guy for his resources.

Would make for a very awkward introduction:

Hi Soul,
I know I'm a nobody, but can you send me your stuff anyways, so I can play around with it on my free time? K, thanks...
:D

33
@Tauceti:
sky is the limit... we have talked about how the system itself can be abused. I am putting it on the table for us to discuss if:
  • it can be abused for the purpose of this challenge.
  • determine the extent or limits of how it can be used for the purpose of this challenge.

34
From what I understand, these were a compilation of separate individual mods made by different users. And Soul made it possible so that you can simply toggle this on and off via the Defiler tool.

Would it be possible make these changes separately and compile them into a database.arz file or even possibly merge them with an existing mod?

I read in some discussions that it was Soul's long term goal to update it's compatibility with AE/AE:R, but it would be nice it can become available sooner (making it myself), unless it's super advanced and intensive.

I'm mainly looking at these:
- freeze time of day
- filter broken & white
- tweaking drop amount & chance
- stacking pots/scrolls
- show damage
- show aggro

If these are relatively simple tweaks compared to the bigger projects people are making, can someone point me to the right direction/resources in making this. I'm aware of the tools to make this happen, but if there was like a user guide to help me figure out which parts i need to be looking at; it would be a lot easier.

It would definitely be worth taking time off the game and learn making this. If it's a very complex change unfit for novice wannabe modders, feel free to discourage me. :D

35
Well, while waiting for a consensus, will be entering two more entries:

Sivon (Champion) 9 - Sparta
Inspired by this video:
.
I will be trying out my 7-Nation Army Build; a low cooldown dual-wield Key of Elysium build, using Tracker's Hood and Talisman of the Jade Emperor in tandem with Refresh. My test runs produced results that exceeded my expectation, wiping the floor with xMax: Typhon, Hades, Fafnir, Sutyr & Hydra w/o breaking a sweat.  I haven't tested area clear potential, but the boss killing capacity was so good it got me excited to run this petmancer hybrid.

Co'Vang (Warden) 10 - Sparta;
This is my 3rd try in following this concept (Shield Charge, Take Down Spam) in AE/AE:R. Hopefully this time, I actually make it far in building the toon to be able to actually execute the concept properly. It actually works on a test toon in Legendary, my problem is getting it to that actual state.

36
she's more than a pet.. it's like what sauruz said, "having a boss with you".. but yeah get her if you want.. it's not like it ruins the game.. you only get her after you beat loki anyway.. and you can't carry her across difficulties

meh didn't see this one... if you get her that late in. Might as well not have her.

37
@botebote77 I'll respect your perspective, since people view things differently, but it's a very purist view. Some players, like the D2 players you mentioned, prioritize optimization (I'd probably fall under this). This Unique Craft system, is basically an optimization tool; a flawed one, but is nonetheless. And min-max players like these will abuse/cheese everything to their advantage to be able to do things you can't usually do under normal conditions.

Taking D2 as an example, this was exactly why build guides could micro their attributes to the exact number, because they already have the gear in place to make their advancement possible, which they couldn't have gotten on their own and their concept would have failed entirely without it. It's not really something that should be looked down on.

As to the actual Unique Crafting System:
backing up your saved files just before you  complete the legendary craftsmanship quest.. if you don't like the reward, just do it over and over again until you get what you want.. this one is outright cheating for me because if you start messing with your character through manipulating game files that is cheating for me.. that is not something that is allowed through regular gaming and I'm sure the devs don't like that


I'll give you this one. It's inherently not an in-game feature therefore it is cheating.

However, given the history of this challenge and its past iterations, moderators of the challenge, have given leniencies to participants in order to make this challenge accessible to the majority:
- Twinking was allowed
- Specific mods (freeze time, stacking pots, tweaked drop rates) were allowed to make it more convenient
- TQVault use is allowed; it came with it's ability to change the bonuses on Relics and Artifacts to cut down the meaningless farm time needed to get the specific one you needed was allowed

These things were not part of regular gameplay but was allowed, because ultimately the challenge was all about clearing xMax with no deaths.
Now, purists will say: "then you could just install Itemus and MI Shop, and you could have achieved the same result". While that's true, that is why it was up to the moderator to define exactly what the limitations were; in other words, how far min-max players like me, can push these boundaries. Like I said in my rant in the thread I posted, this feature is essentially a "gamble system" like D2's Horadric Cube. Gamble systems are usually repeatable because it gives the player a chance to get something good at a cost. In TQ, however, they didn't have a stand alone system to do this and probably had no choice but to tie it in as a quest reward making it a one-time only thing. This is why I say the whole system is flawed... at the very least that's my argument for it  >:D

In Pre-AE, there were already players in multiplayer that were able to hack uniques with editors to give it Affixes. It would have been easier to do that, but that would be real cheating. While #1 isn't exactly a clean method it still uses the system that is within the game to provide result; just that you are optimizing the result.

making several accomplished hero characters doing speed runs until the legendary craftsmanship quest (you can do it in normal).. then giving it to your HC character.. that way you can twink your character making all his/her items upgraded.. now i can't say this one is cheating because this is something allowed through regular gaming.. but this one i call cheesing.. for those who don't know, cheesing in gaming, in its simplest form means making your character overpowered so you won't have much difficulty.. ok so it's not really overpowered because it's xmax.. well, that what challenges are for.. you do what is difficult that it's not easily done by other players.. that's what makes it satisfying and what puts your character above the rest.. but if you do it not within the regular context of the game, what sets your character apart from the rest?


This is once again up to the moderator. I am also not in favor on an challenge entry with a 7-legendary quest crafted items equipped, but it is up to the moderator to define the limitations and restrictions of this system. Equipping 3 items with "vet of the glade" and 2 items with "Hale of the Mammoth" would guarantee any class with even the most retarded build a challenge completion.

Hand-me downs, however in my opinion, should be allowed (it is a form of twinking, which is already allowed).

38
is she respawnable after she dies? or once she dies, that's it?

39
Items / Re: New Ragnarok Items Showcase (spoilers)
« on: 22 March 2018, 09:28:47 »
I want to consult everyone's opinion regarding this item (attached below):

The +skills bonus say that it's an item made with a Druid in mind. What confuses me is the generous bonus on +% and flat DEX on the item. Is there a DEX-based theory builds for Druids I'm not aware of? Normally you'd associate the class as a pure mage. Not even as a hybrid.

40
Anniversary Edition - General discussion / Re: XmaX on Ragnarok
« on: 22 March 2018, 08:50:28 »
I'd like to report here that xMax has stability issues with Ragnarok (Act 5) and can cause your game (Steam) to crash after extended gameplay.
I now make it a habit to manually Save Game every 15 minutes.

Running it with i7-7700, 16GB ram, GTX-1060 6GB and installed the game on a dedicated SSD for a supposed performance boost. I would like to believe that it's not my rig's fault...
Is this a compatibility issue and is there any way to fix this?

41
This is a good find... Thanks @botebote77, now my freakin petmancers now finally have an answer to xMax Hardcore... This is amazing :D Imagine if you're able to equip Yiva with gear... hahaha. The world will end.

42
I have a lot of toons, especially the OP ones that haven't used their Quest rewards simply because they don't need the powerspike.
But if I'm going to build something retarded like a Shield Charge, Takedown Spammer Warden, I'm guessing it needs all the help it can get.
Or maybe when using lower tiered classes like: Illusionist, Magician or Sorcerer.

43
@MedeaFleecestealer  Will you allow Blacksmith Exploit Twinking in this challenge?
https://titanquestfans.net/index.php?topic=175.0

If so, you can set the limitations for it as you wish. Better than nothing.
 >:D >:D >:D

44
Loki, I don't see why not... but Hades, I wouldn't even dare.
3 3rd form Hades is frustrating as f#$%. Even with capped stun resist, the chain stun is real. Lost 2 toons in Legendaries and more in Normal when doing it without twinked gear that way.

45
General Discussion / Re: The Theory of Hybrid
« on: 21 March 2018, 17:54:46 »
Pre-AE is a different ball game alltogether. Remember how Scatter Shot Arrows fragments used to in turn fragment themselves, and distribute any elemental damage carried by the main shot? Bowmen were stupidly OP.

Im pretty sure pre-AE never carried elemental damage bonus on to Scatter Shot; they ended at Volley. Someone corrected me on this when I was theorycrafting. Forgot who, I think it was Violos. If it did, no one would've complained playing as an Avenger and Sage.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 9

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal